Global Sustainability Problem for Global Warming- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theGlobal Sustainability Problem for Global Warming. Answer: Introduction: Background As the population of the world continues to grow at a rapid rate, there is an increased demand of natural resources that is encountered by the society. This is one of the major issues encountered by the world population in order to maintain Global sustainability. It is important to mention that sustainable development practice is an essential component of an advanced global society that can help to deal with the issues related energy crisis and other environmental issues. Scarcity of natural resources is one of the major challenges to sustainable development practice. With the rise of energy demand that is needed to provide the fuel for the latest technology and automobiles, it is important to extract the natural resources that include coal, minerals and petroleum products (Elbehri et al. 2013, p. 42). The excess extraction of the natural resources is also posing image of threat to the future generation, who has the risk to face energy crisis. Climate change and global warming is also one of the major environmental concerns of present generation. Excess use of fossil fuel is one of the major causes of pollutants that are being exposed within the atmosphere (Head Alford 2015, p.712). These pollutants are the major cause of global warming and climate change. It is essential for the present generation to properly identify the issues related to sustainability. It is also essential to properly define the character of the wicked nature of the problem that is the primary steps that is needed to implement proper intervention measures to maintain sustainability (Elbehri et al. 2013, p. 42). Wicked Problem Fracking (Coal-Seam Gas extraction) in Australia The rise of energy demand in all parts of the globe, there is a sense of urgency in order to discover alternative source of energy that can help to maintain sustainability the global environment (Head Alford 2015, p.712). The research paper of Camillus (2016), has mentioned about the importance of gas that is used as the major parts of fossil fuel, which is believed to be one of the effective ways to maintain clean environment. The Fracking technique is used in the context that is implemented by the government of Australia to extract clean gas. The source from where this clean gas is extracted is called shale and coal seam gas (CSG). In Queensland and New South Wales region of Australia there is a huge Reserve of coal seam gas which is believed to be one of the effective ways to reduce the environmental pollution that is caused by other fossil fuel. It is essential to expand the range of the Shale gas industry, which will enable application enlarge scale commercial purposes. Nevertheless, Termeer et al. (2015, p.681), have mentioned about the characteristics of the Wicked problem, which is associated with the application of and extraction process of coal seam gas in the Australian region. The wicked nature of the problem is due to the fact that it is difficult to identify the challenges that are associated with coal seam gas. It is one of the major issues that are encountered by the policy makers in order to implement proper intervention steps. Characteristics of Wicked Problem Zijp et al. (2016, p.320), have mentioned about the important characteristics in order to identify the wicked problems related to sustainability. It is not possible to properly define the nature of the wicked problem, as there is no fixed formula. Hence, it is not possible to get a proper statement. The validity of the solution of wicked nature the problem is dependent upon the stakeholders, who are implementing intervention measures. They have to judge the proper solution depending upon the less bad nature (Head Alford 2015, p.712). There is also significant consequence in the implementation process of each solution of the wicked problem. The unique nature of every type of wicked problem is also one of the major challenge and characteristics. Hence, it is not possible to characterize or classify the issues, which can help to formulate a fixed solution. This is also important to mention that in most of the cases, the policy makers have to encounter with new challenges related to the wicked nature of the problem (Wood et al. 2014, p. 140). The wicked nature of the problem is also one of major factor due to the fact that they issues that are created are always intertwined with some other problems. In most cases, the root cause of the problems also cannot be identified. Aim of the Essay and Preferred Structure The main purpose of the current report is to formulate a systematic and Critical development solution for all type of sustainability challenges. The sustainability issues related to the Fracking coal seam gas extraction in Australia will be highlighted in the current report. Proper methods that are needed to deal with the issues related to the suitability concern in Fracking coal seam gas extraction is also mentioned in the report that can be used by the policy makers of Australia. Discussion: As it has been evident that the world is facing great challenges in terms of sustainability issues, it has to be said that the leaders need to take the necessary actions that would help them to overcome these distresses. Coal seam gas extraction include the extraction of the gas and other resources by the means of vertical drilling and horizontal drilling that involves different types of activities that can easily result in the decline of the environmental sustainability (Wood et al. 2014, p. 140). It has been a typical issue faced by the Australian government in order to combat against the declining impact of the sustainability of the environment. Coal-Seam Gas extraction as a wicked problem: It has been found that intensive researches have been carried on regarding the health impact that the coal seam gas mining is causing to the environment. This has created a wicked problem of sustainability to the leaders because according to the major characteristics of the wicked problem, the problem solving of this particular state is not easy but there are many issues that intervene the issue and do not allow overcoming the problem (Liu et al. 2015, p. 125452). It has to be understood that in the process of extraction of any resource, there will be certain instances that would create problems in managing sustainability. This might not be only a single problem that is intervening worldwide but there are many other such issues, but the quality of life of the people of Australia has hampered due to this particular problem (Rasche Waddock 2014, p. 215). The farm land, water resources and even the live stock of the country is threatened by the ill impact the drilling and extraction of the gas and other fuels. There needs to be health and safety and the economic stability of the country and all these aspects should fall under the responsibility of the leaders of the organisation. Analysing based on the three pillar model of sustainability: According to the three pillar model of sustainability, every big and small company needs to deliver its products and services in a way that would fit the sustainable approach of the company and that it would abide by the sustainability strategies and programs of the particular organisation (Wood et al. 2014, p. 160). The first pillar is the environmental pillar that requires the most attention. For an extraction company, focusing on the carbon footprints and its impact on the planet happens to be the most vital part for the leaders of the organisation. The very next pillar is the social pillar that talks about the health and concerns of the people of a particular region (Alonso?Almeida, Llac Marimon, 2014, p. 330). As it has been noted that the extraction of the resources has resulted in the poor condition of life of the people of Australia, it has automatically created question on the sustainability approach. The third pillar is the economic pillar that talks about the concept that the sustainability also requires the organisations to focus on the profitability of the organisation (Benn, Dunphy Griffiths 2014, p. 50). For the same purpose, including compliance, proper governance and risk management are the major criterion that should be the concern of the leaders. Current approach towards solving the sustainability issue and system thinking: If the current approach of solving the sustainability issue that the organisation is facing in the recent time is looked into, it has been found that the approaches are very lame and the leaders are not able to overcome the issues and problems of the environment (Epstein Buhovac 2014, p. 132). However, there are certain approaches that can be easily undertaken by the organisation to reduce the harmful impact of the extraction of oil and other resources. For instance, in order to extract the oil, the organisation can easily come up with better sustainable approaches using better technological approaches that have received governmental approvals as well (Anderies et al. 2013, p. 240). Effort has to be made on removing the high quantity of the green house gases that are responsible for creating poor impact on the environment. The infrastructure of the business needs to be building in a strong way that would help the organisation to fight against the declining condition of the environme nt. Synthesis: By the means of understanding the management discipline towards understanding the system and creating a linkage and interaction with the sustainability of the environment, certain system thinking approaches need to be applied in the process of extraction of the resources (Miller et al. 2014, p. 240). These systems will counter a number of policies and practices that needs to be adopted by the leaders in order to overcome the sustainability issues faced by the particular leader. In addition to this, it is equally important to set certain goals and communication objectives in order to bind the system of the organisation altogether (Brown et al. 2014, p. 53). The whole system might fail if the leadership approach is not taken in a proper and just manner. If the sustainability issue is taken to the international dimension as well, it has to be said that the negative impact of the complete oil and gas extraction can result in creating question up on the leadership quality. This in turn might result in the complete failure of the system or the organisation within the organisation resulting in international and global failure. In the view point of Junior, Best Cotter (2014, p. 10), that there is no such problem that can be considered as wicked and that cannot be treated up on. There should be a basic understanding on the overall work of the organisation that would directly contribute towards overcoming the challenges that the particular organisation is facing in the recent time. There is no scope of including the structural system approach into the business activity, but it is expected that there should be functional approach towards the business for the sake of extraction of oil and other components that would automatically results in better sustainability (Herrero et al. 2013, p. 20889). Conclusion: Examining the approach of the organisation or the leader towards sustainability, it has been found that there is lack of approach of saving the environment when it comes to improving the environmental or the social condition of the country. Many people have been found to suffer as a result of the extraction of oil and gas from the mines that has directly created question on the responsibility of the global leaders towards sustainability. In fact, the leaders themselves have clearly stated that they are not being able to address the problems and they are in fact looking for a better approach towards the sustainability. It is expected that the leader should undertake certain systematic approaches in order to overcome the issues caused by the activities of the organisation. This is the only way of achieving sustainability of the business and to leave a positive impact on the environment where the particular organisation works. References: Alonso?Almeida, M., Llach, J. Marimon, F., 2014. A closer look at the Global Reporting Initiativesustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,21(6), pp.318-335. Anderies, J., Folke, C., Walker, B. Ostrom, E., 2013. Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability.Ecology and society,18(2). pp.239-246 Benn, S., Dunphy, D. Griffiths, A., 2014.Organizational change for corporate sustainability. Routledge. Brown, V.A., Grootjans, J., Ritchie, J., Townsend, M. Verrinder, G., 2014.Sustainability and health: supporting global ecological integrity in public health. Routledge. Camillus, J.C., 2016. Taming Wicked Problems in Strategy Wicked Strategies and the Business of Humanity. Elbehri, A., Segerstedt, A. Liu, P., 2013. Biofuels and the sustainability challenge: a global assessment of sustainability issues, trends and policies for biofuels and related feedstocks. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Epstein, M.J. Buhovac, A.R., 2014.Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. pp.318-335 Head, B.W. Alford, J., 2015. Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration Society, 47(6), pp.711-739. Herrero, M., Havlk, P., Valin, H., Notenbaert, A., Rufino, M.C., Thornton, P.K., Blmmel, M., Weiss, F., Grace, D. Obersteiner, M., 2013. Biomass use, production, feed efficiencies, and greenhouse gas emissions from global livestock systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,110(52), pp.20888-20893. Junior, R.M., Best, P.J. Cotter, J., 2014. Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon.Journal of Business Ethics,120(1), pp.1-11. Liu, J., Mooney, H., Hull, V., Davis, S.J., Gaskell, J., Hertel, T., Lubchenco, J., Seto, K.C., Gleick, P., Kremen, C. Li, S., 2015. Systems integration for global sustainability.Science,347(6225), p.1258832. Miller, T.R., Wiek, A., Sarewitz, D., Robinson, J., Olsson, L., Kriebel, D. Loorbach, D., 2014. The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda.Sustainability science,9(2), pp.239-246. Rasche, A. Waddock, S., 2014. Global sustainability governance and the UN Global Compact: A rejoinder to critics.Journal of Business Ethics,122(2), pp.209-216. Termeer, C.J., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G. Stiller, S.J., 2015. Governance capabilities for dealing wisely with wicked problems. Administration Society, 47(6), pp.680-710. Wood, R., Stadler, K., Bulavskaya, T., Lutter, S., Giljum, S., de Koning, A., Kuenen, J., Schtz, H., Acosta-Fernndez, J., Usubiaga, A. Simas, M., 2014. Global sustainability accountingdeveloping EXIOBASE for multi-regional footprint analysis.Sustainability,7(1), pp.138-163. Zijp, M.C., Posthuma, L., Wintersen, A., Devilee, J. Swartjes, F.A., 2016. Definition and use of solution-focused sustainability assessment: a novel approach to generate, explore and decide on sustainable solutions for wicked problems. Environment international, 91, pp.319-331.